x
x
x
x

Mon, November 18, 2019

IAAF v Cyrus Rutto

IAAF v Cyrus Rutto

A decision in the case of the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) v Cyrus Rutto has been published by the Disciplinary Tribunal.

On 4th April 2019 Mr Rutto was charged by the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) with an anti-doping rule violation in connection with abnormalities in blood samples of his Athlete Biological Passport that are alleged to indicate blood manipulation.

The Disciplinary Tribunal panel, consisting of Justice Ahamed Ebrahim, Steven Bainbridge and Philipp Kotlaba, found that the athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 2.2 of the 2018 IAAF rules and therefore ruled that a period of ineligibility of four years would be imposed upon Mr Rutto. 

The secretariat to the Disciplinary Tribunal is managed by Sport Resolutions.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

To go to the AIU’s website please click here.

Share

Recent News Articles

Fri, November 22, 2024

Robot umpires in Major League Baseball by 2026

Major League Baseball has declared plans to test robot umpires, with the potential for permanent implementation by 2026

Read More

Fri, November 22, 2024

World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association (WPBSA) v Mark King

A decision in the case brought by the WPBSA against Mark King, who was charged for Match Fixing offences, has been issued by the WPBSA Disciplinary Committee

Read More

Thu, November 21, 2024

Members sought for ECB’s independent tribunal, Cricket Discipline Panel

The England and Wales Cricket Board is seeking individuals with legal and sports disciplinary expertise to join its independent Cricket Discipline Panel

Read More