Thu, August 05, 2021

Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

Related Documents

• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision
• Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)Decision