Caster Semenya wins European Court of Human Rights appeal

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

Former Olympic champion Caster Semenya has won her appeal at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) after it found she was discriminated against by rules which forced her to lower her testosterone levels in order to continue competing. 

Semenya was born with differences of sexual development (DSD) which means that she has higher than normal testosterone levels for a woman. In 2018 World Athletics introduced new regulations which required Semenya to take testosterone reducing medication if she wished to compete in events between 400m and one mile. 

Semenya’s appeal was not against the World Athletics regulations but rather against the Swiss Supreme Court decision three years ago with the ECHR ruling the Swiss government did not protect Semenya from being discriminated against when its Supreme Court refused to overturn a decision by the Court of Arbitration for Sport which upheld World Athletics rules governing the participation of athletes with DSD. 

In a statement World Athletics said “We remain of the view that the DSD regulations are a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of protecting fair competition in the female category as the Court of Arbitration for Sport and Swiss Federal Tribunal both found, after a detailed and expert assessment of the evidence. The case was filed against the state of Switzerland, rather than World Athletics. We will liaise with the Swiss government on the next steps and, given the strong dissenting views in the decision, we will be encouraging them to seek referral of the case to the ECHR Grand Chamber for a final and definitive decision. In the meantime, the current DSD regulations, approved by World Athletics Council in March 2023, will remain in place.”

An ECHR statement said “The court found in particular that the applicant had not been afforded sufficient institutional and procedural safeguards in Switzerland to allow her to have her complaints examined effectively, especially since her complaints concerned substantiated and credible claims of discrimination as a result of her increased testosterone level caused by differences of sex development.”

Image credit: Yann Caradec

You may also like

View All

ITIA v Markéta Vondroušová

A decision in the case of the International Tennis Integrity Agency against Markéta Vondroušová has been issued by the Independent Panel

Read More

FA increases minimum six match ban for discrimination to ten matches

The English Football Association will raise its minimum six match ban for discrimination to ten matches, stating that discriminatory behaviour “continues to be a challenge across the game”

Read More

Brazilian court ties player suspension to injured opponent’s recovery time in rare ruling

A Brazilian court has ruled that Internacional player, Victor Gabriel’s, suspension for a tackle which seriously injured his opponent, Cruzeiro’s Gabriel Pec, will be tied to the time it takes Pec to recover

Read More