x
x
x
x

Thu, August 05, 2021

Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

Mark Dry v UKAD (Appeal)

A decision in the case of Mark Dry v UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) (Appeal) has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Mr Mark Dry, a GB hammer thrower, appealed a UKAD decision that imposed a 28 month period of Ineligibility upon him.  

The NADP Tribunal, consisting of Jeremy Summers (Chair), Katherine Apps and Carole Billington-Wood dismissed the Appeal. The 28 month period of Ineligibility remains in effect and will expire on 24 January 2022. 

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

Share

Recent News Articles

Thu, January 30, 2025

Barcelona players criticise plans to host women’s Supercopa in Saudi Arabia amid concerns over women’s rights

Barcelona footballers have expressed concerns about the proposal to host the Women’s Supercopa in Saudi Arabia, citing issues related to the country’s human rights record. Players have raised questions about the motivations behind the decision, particularly regarding financial incentives and reports of harassment during the Men’s Supercopa in Saudi Arabia

Read More

Thu, January 30, 2025

FIH makes face masks mandatory when defending penalty corners

The International Hockey Federation has decided to make it mandatory for all players to wear a face mask when defending penalty corners in all events, effective immediately

Read More

Wed, January 29, 2025

UKAD sees record number of whistleblower reports on doping in sport, highlighting growing efforts to protect integrity

Since launching its whistleblower initiative in November 2020, UK Anti-Doping received an unprecedented number of tip-offs in 2024

Read More