Sports Arbitration: More Than Just Lawyers - Is It Time to Rethink Who Decides?
Join us during London Arbitration Week for a panel discussion exploring what makes sports dispute resolution trusted, effective and fit for the future
Thu, December 15, 2016
To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.
On this day in 1994, the former 800m Olympic runner and Commonwealth Games Gold Medalist Diane Modahl was found guilty of using performance enhancing drugs and banned for four years.
Modahl declared her innocence and a year later won her appeal to the British Athletics Federation (BAF) and in 1996 was cleared of the charges brought against her by the International Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF). It ruled that her sample had been mishandled.
Modahl subsequently pursued a civil claim against the BAF without success which resulted in her personal bankrupy and the demise of the governing body.
It was against this backdrop that the Sports Dispute Resolution Panel (SDRP) (later renamed Sport Resolutions (UK)) was created by the representative umbrella groups of sport in the United Kingdom to provide an expert, speedy, and cost-effective alternative to resolving conflict and disputes in sport.
Photo Author: University of Salford Press Office
Join us during London Arbitration Week for a panel discussion exploring what makes sports dispute resolution trusted, effective and fit for the future
Women football players are most likely to consider retiring early due to financial and mental health issues, with employment standards failing to keep pace with a boom in certain areas, as reported by FIFPRO
The Women Super League, the highest level of women's football in England, is set to receive additional investment in match officiating, with full-time referees expected to be introduced in 2029