Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Leigh Dearden

To optimise for archiving, the original image and related documents associated with this article have been removed.

A decision in the case of the Rugby Football Union (RFU) v Leigh Dearden has been published by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP). 

On 23 March 2019 Leigh Dearden, a player registered with Lincoln RFC and the RFU, provided a urine sample.  The urine sample returned Adverse Analytical Findings for Drostanolone and a metabolite, 2 metabolites of Oxymetholone, and cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine.  Mr Dearden was subsequently charged with a breach of World Rugby Regulation 21.2.1 for the Presence of Prohibited Substances or their Metabolites or Markers on 31 May 2019.

Mr Dearden did not dispute the Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) and the NADP Tribunal, consisting of Christopher Quinlan QC, Blondel Thompson and Professor Dorian Haskard imposed a period of ineligibility of 4 years, running from 31 May 2019 until midnight on 30 May 2023.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related links tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

You may also like

View All

Sport Resolutions strengthens commitment to gender equity through Brighton Plus Helsinki Declaration

Sport Resolutions joins the global movement for gender equity, signing the Brighton plus Helsinki Declaration 

Read More

UK Anti-Doping is looking to hire a lawyer

UK Anti-Doping is recruiting a Lawyer to join its Legal and Regulatory Affairs Directorate and play an active role in maintaining an efficient Case Management function

Read More

World Athletics v Hillary Kipchirchir Chepkwony

A decision in the case of World Athletics against Mr Hillary Kipchirchir Chepkwony has been issued by the Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal

Read More