x
x
x
x

Thu, October 24, 2024

UK Anti-Doping v Finley Evans

UK Anti-Doping v Finley Evans

A decision in the case of UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) against Finley Evans has been issued by the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP).

Welsh rugby union player Mr Finley Evans was charged by UKAD with committing Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs)  pursuant to ADR Article 2.1, in that a Prohibited Substance, ostarine, was present in the Sample he provided during an Out-of-Competition test on 12 December 2023, and ADR Article 2.2, in that he used a Prohibited Substance, ostarine, on or before 12 December 2023.

Mr Evans didn’t dispute the ADRVs but sought to mitigate sanctions by arguing that 1) his intentions were not intentional 2) he bore No Significant Fault or Negligence. 

The National Anti-Doping Tribunal, comprised of Charles Hollander KC (Chair), Lorraine Johnson and Dr Chinyere Ezewuzie, was appointed to determine this matter. 

A remote hearing was held on 27 August 2024, focusing on two supplements: 1) Black Mamba-Myostat that he purchased on or around 16 November 2023; 2) Epicatalean, Cellucor C4 Original Pre-Work Out Shot, which he purchased at the gym and paid for in cash. 

Mr Evans destroyed all supplements in his possession upon receiving the Notice of Charge, making it impossible for any of these supplements to be subjected to laboratory analysis. There was no scientific evidence before the Tribunal, other than that provided by the independent expert witness. Any conclusion as to the source of the Adverse Analytical Findings (AAF) would be mere speculation. 

Accordingly, the Tribunal was satisfied as Mr Evans had admitted he had committed the ADRVs pursuant to ADR Articles 2.1 and 2.2. But with no scientific evidence before the Tribunal Mr Evans was unable to discharge the burden of proof to satisfy the Tribunal that the cause of the ADRVs was not intentional and the question of No Significant Fault or Negligence did not arise. and The Tribunal imposed a period of Ineligibility of four years. Mr Evans received credit for the period of Provisional Suspension; hence, the four year period of Ineligibility was set to run from 19 January 2024 and end at midnight 18 January 2028.

A copy of the full decision can be accessed via the related documents tab on the right-hand side.

The National Anti-Doping Panel is the United Kingdom’s independent tribunal responsible for adjudicating anti-doping disputes in sport. It is operated by Sport Resolutions and is entirely independent of UK Anti-Doping who is responsible for investigating, charging, and prosecuting cases before the NADP.

Share

Recent News Articles

Tue, December 03, 2024

20 views

WADA opens call for interest for President and Vice-President election

The World Anti-Doping Agency has opened a public call for interest for the election of the Agency’s next independent President and Vice-President 

Read More

Mon, December 02, 2024

126 views

SAVE THE DATE | The Must-Attend Event for Sports and Law Professionals – Sport Resolutions’ 10th Annual Conference

Sport Resolutions is excited to announce its 10th Annual Conference, taking place on Thursday 1st May 2025, at the Leonardo Royal London St Paul's Hotel. Join top legal and sports professionals for a day of expert panels, insightful discussions, and networking. Mark your calendars for this unmissable event!

Read More

Mon, December 02, 2024

101 views

Olympic medal winner Jakob Ingebrigtsen’s father and former coach to appear in court over allegations of misconduct against his sons

The father and previous coach of two-time Olympic champion runner, Jakob Ingebrigtsen, will stand trial for alleged physical, verbal and mental abuse against his sons

Read More