Wimbledon eliminates line judges after 147 years in favour of Hawk-Eye Live


Wimbledon eliminates line judges after 147 years in favour of Hawk-Eye Live

The technology, which has been in use at the Australian Open and US Open since 2021, will replace line judges at Wimbledon next year for the first time in history. Hawk-Eye Live will be used on all courts for both the main draw and the qualifying competition. The technology was being trialled during Wimbledon this year. It works by placing 12 tracking cameras around each court.

Wimbledon’s chief executive, Sally Bolton, voiced that:

“The decision to introduce Live Electronic Line Calling at the Championships was made following a significant period of consideration and consultation. Having reviewed the results of the testing undertaken at the Championships this year, we consider the technology to be sufficiently robust and the time is right to take this important step in seeking maximum accuracy in our officiating. For the players, it will offer them the same conditions they have played under at a number of other events on tour.”

Many believe that the use of the technology is vital for more accurate and quicker decisions. They also believe that the technology will prevent arguments on the court. However, others highlight the loss of employment and the ethical concerns of replacing humans with technology. Some argue the tournament will be less interesting as there will be a lack of controversy. Others also suggest that the decision will reduce sponsorship opportunities as line judges wear Ralph Lauren during the tournament.

It is now only the French Open, for the time being, which seems to be sticking with tradition by continuing to employ line judges. Chair umpires, however, will be retained in all competitions, including Wimbledon.

You may also like

View All

Los Angeles 2028 Olympic organisers generated over $2 billion in commercial revenue so far

The Los Angeles 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games organising committee have generated over $2 billion in domestic sponsorship revenue so far, meaning it may become one of the most commercially successful Olympics in history

Read More

World Athletics v Sheila Chelangat

A decision in the case of World Athletics (WA) against Sheila Chelangat (the Athlete) has been issued by the WA Disciplinary and Appeals Tribunal (DAT)

Read More

WNBA proposes $1 million base salary along with compensation tied more closely to the league’s revenue

In the Women’s National Basketball Association’s latest collective bargaining agreement update, it has proposed a $1 million base salary for athletes on max deals, which is the largest contract a player can sign, partly determined by their years of service in the league, and has agreed to increase compensation in line with revenue growth

Read More